Harry Potter was richer than Edward Cullen
The Heat magazine has released its annual ranking of the richest young Britons. For the second year in a row, it was headed by the performer of the role of Harry Potter, Daniel Radcliffe, who earned ? 51.7 million in 2011. A year earlier, the actor's earnings were `` more modest '' - 46.6 million pounds. Keira Knightley was again in second place, who managed to replenish her fortune with an amount of 30.8 million pounds. The actress's earnings mainly consisted not of royalties for participation in movie projects, but of the funds received for shooting in advertising. Robert Pattinson managed to take only the third line of the rating, who earned a little more than 24.7 million pounds in 2011 ... Pattinson's well-being is based solely on his participation in the Twilight saga. The Potterians round out the top five Emma Watson and Rupert Grint. Their wealth increased by ? 23.9 million and ? 21.7 million, respectively. Note that the study takes into account only the earnings of Britons under 30. The Topic of Article: Harry Potter was richer than Edward Cullen. |
